From daf3761c9fcde0f4ca64321cbed6c1c86d304193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:44:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] namei: results of d_is_negative() should be checked after dentry revalidation Leandro Awa writes: "After switching to version 4.1.6, our parallelized and distributed workflows now fail consistently with errors of the form: T34: ./regex.c:39:22: error: config.h: No such file or directory From our 'git bisect' testing, the following commit appears to be the possible cause of the behavior we've been seeing: commit 766c4cbfacd8" Al Viro says: "What happens is that 766c4cbfacd8 got the things subtly wrong. We used to treat d_is_negative() after lookup_fast() as "fall with ENOENT". That was wrong - checking ->d_flags outside of ->d_seq protection is unreliable and failing with hard error on what should've fallen back to non-RCU pathname resolution is a bug. Unfortunately, we'd pulled the test too far up and ran afoul of another kind of staleness. The dentry might have been absolutely stable from the RCU point of view (and we might be on UP, etc), but stale from the remote fs point of view. If ->d_revalidate() returns "it's actually stale", dentry gets thrown away and the original code wouldn't even have looked at its ->d_flags. What we need is to check ->d_flags where 766c4cbfacd8 does (prior to ->d_seq validation) but only use the result in cases where we do not discard this dentry outright" Reported-by: Leandro Awa Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104911 Fixes: 766c4cbfacd8 ("namei: d_is_negative() should be checked...") Tested-by: Leandro Awa Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.1+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Acked-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/namei.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 726d211db484..33e9495a3129 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -1558,8 +1558,6 @@ static int lookup_fast(struct nameidata *nd, negative = d_is_negative(dentry); if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, seq)) return -ECHILD; - if (negative) - return -ENOENT; /* * This sequence count validates that the parent had no @@ -1580,6 +1578,12 @@ static int lookup_fast(struct nameidata *nd, goto unlazy; } } + /* + * Note: do negative dentry check after revalidation in + * case that drops it. + */ + if (negative) + return -ENOENT; path->mnt = mnt; path->dentry = dentry; if (likely(__follow_mount_rcu(nd, path, inode, seqp))) -- 2.34.1