From f276795627045a3c599a60b476767861e4318c7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zach Brown Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:37:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix btrfs_cont_expand() freeing IS_ERR em btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop. An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407 I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors (ENOMEM, EIO; whatever). This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). Signed-off-by: Zach Brown Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index ac98384b174e..3d2c64d4734a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3677,6 +3677,7 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inode, loff_t oldsize, loff_t size) block_end - cur_offset, 0); if (IS_ERR(em)) { err = PTR_ERR(em); + em = NULL; break; } last_byte = min(extent_map_end(em), block_end); -- 2.34.1