From f35d88f439507c729e1f98522d9865b02fdc7c9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:17:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] remove a constructor implementation that isn't declared in
 the header.  How can both clang and gcc accept this?

PR6703


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@99658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 lib/System/Unix/Mutex.inc | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/System/Unix/Mutex.inc b/lib/System/Unix/Mutex.inc
index 10e7ecb75a5..4a5e28de27b 100644
--- a/lib/System/Unix/Mutex.inc
+++ b/lib/System/Unix/Mutex.inc
@@ -28,12 +28,6 @@ MutexImpl::~MutexImpl()
 {
 }
 
-bool 
-MutexImpl::MutexImpl()
-{
-  return true;
-}
-
 bool 
 MutexImpl::release()
 {
-- 
2.34.1