From f62a007603f86d36b920265bbf6ae0c698d882d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:55:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Accurately track when we mark the hardware as idle/busy We currently call intel_mark_idle() too often, as we do so as a side-effect of processing the request queue. However, we the calls to intel_mark_idle() are expected to be paired with a call to intel_mark_busy() (or else we try to idle the hardware by accessing registers that are already disabled). Make the idle/busy tracking explicit to prevent the multiple calls. v2: We can drop some of the complexity in __i915_add_request() as queue_delayed_work() already behaves as we want (not requeuing the item if it is already in the queue) and mark_busy/mark_idle imply that the idle task is inactive. v3: We do still need to cancel the pending idle task so that it is sent again after the current busy load completes (not in the middle of it). Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Paulo Zanoni Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 14 +++++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 944c6174cd42..0d1e8bebaecd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1124,6 +1124,14 @@ struct i915_gem_mm { */ bool interruptible; + /** + * Is the GPU currently considered idle, or busy executing userspace + * requests? Whilst idle, we attempt to power down the hardware and + * display clocks. In order to reduce the effect on performance, there + * is a slight delay before we do so. + */ + bool busy; + /** Bit 6 swizzling required for X tiling */ uint32_t bit_6_swizzle_x; /** Bit 6 swizzling required for Y tiling */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 3618bb0cda0a..6978e692cd82 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2148,7 +2148,6 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private; struct drm_i915_gem_request *request; u32 request_ring_position, request_start; - int was_empty; int ret; request_start = intel_ring_get_tail(ring); @@ -2199,7 +2198,6 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx); request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies; - was_empty = list_empty(&ring->request_list); list_add_tail(&request->list, &ring->request_list); request->file_priv = NULL; @@ -2220,13 +2218,11 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, if (!dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) { i915_queue_hangcheck(ring->dev); - if (was_empty) { - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->mm.idle_work); - queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, - &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, - round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ)); - intel_mark_busy(dev_priv->dev); - } + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->mm.idle_work); + queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, + &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, + round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ)); + intel_mark_busy(dev_priv->dev); } if (out_seqno) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 842b07ed742a..ef26312e98dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -8197,8 +8197,12 @@ void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + if (dev_priv->mm.busy) + return; + hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy(dev_priv); i915_update_gfx_val(dev_priv); + dev_priv->mm.busy = true; } void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev) @@ -8206,6 +8210,11 @@ void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev) struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct drm_crtc *crtc; + if (!dev_priv->mm.busy) + return; + + dev_priv->mm.busy = false; + hsw_package_c8_gpu_idle(dev_priv); if (!i915.powersave) -- 2.34.1